Information library
These guides explain general warning signs and practical verification steps. A warning sign is a reason to check, not proof that a particular person has committed fraud. Rules, reporting routes and institutional responsibilities vary by country. Publication of a guide does not imply an official partnership or a guaranteed result.
- Understanding suspicious online investment offers
An offer deserves closer examination when the promised return is unusually high, described as guaranteed or presented as available only if you act immediately. A polished dashboard, a well-produced video or a recommendation in a private group does not establish who holds your money. Treat claims about safety and authorisation as claims to verify independently.
- Recognising cryptocurrency fraud warning signs
Cryptocurrency transactions and wallet software can be confusing, which makes technical language useful to impostors. Claims of guaranteed trading profits, “risk-free” staking or an exclusive arbitrage system deserve independent checks. A token balance shown on a website is not evidence that assets are held for you or can be withdrawn.
- Understanding blocked or delayed withdrawals
A delayed withdrawal does not automatically establish fraud. Published processing periods, technical faults or legitimate account checks can cause delays. Concern increases when explanations keep changing, stated deadlines pass without evidence or access is made conditional on sending new money to another account.
- Advance payments to unlock withdrawals
A request for a new payment before existing funds can be released is a significant warning sign, particularly when the requested amount grows after each payment. It may be labelled a tax, liquidity deposit, compliance charge, wallet activation or insurance. The label alone does not establish a valid obligation.
- Understanding common recovery scams
People who have lost money may receive unsolicited offers from someone claiming to be a lawyer, investigator, official agency or blockchain specialist. The caller may know details of an earlier payment. Such knowledge does not prove authority: information can be passed between criminals or obtained from public posts.
- What information and evidence to preserve
Start with a simple timeline: when contact began, what was offered, when payments were made and when a problem appeared. Distinguish facts you can document from your interpretation. Keep the exact website addresses and usernames; similar names can refer to entirely different entities.
- Which types of authorities may be relevant?
The appropriate contact depends on where you live, where the provider operates, what happened and how payment was made. A language version of this site does not determine jurisdiction. Start by identifying the issue: suspected criminal deception, a regulated-service complaint, a consumer dispute or a payment problem.
- How to independently verify official organisations
Do not start from a link sent by someone requesting money or documents. Independently locate the institution through a trusted government directory or an already verified official website. Search advertisements and prominent search positions are not proof of official status; look closely at the complete domain.